Biofuels emissions authors say biofuels OK if made from waste, perennials, or abandoned land

The University of Minnesota researchers who started a global controversy over biofuels emissions, with an article in Science magazine that has been reprinted and discussed around the globe, said that biofuels would be OK as practiced in….Minnesota.

The researchers said that land conversions would run up a carbon debt mitigated only after 423 years of palm oil production in Indonesia, 167 years of soy production in Brazil, and 167 years of corn production in the USA.

However, they added that ethanol made from perennial prairie plants in Minnesota would incur little or no carbon debt and offer immediate and sustained greenhouse gas emissions. The researchers said that biofuels made from waste biomass, or using abandoned agricultural lands, are appropriate areas for biofuels production.

The 93 percent increase in greenhouse gases from biofuels production, predicted in two articles in Science magazine, has attracted initial responses from biofuels advocates.

Brian Jennings, executive vice-president of the American Coalition for Ethanol, testifying before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on the implementation of the Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS), cited concerns about the proposed penalizing of corn-based ethanol for so-called “indirect land use changes” that are calculated against the fuel’s lifecycle emissions analysis.

Some models being developed assume that increased demand for corn in the U.S. is causing previously uncultivated land in developing nations to be cleared for agricultural production. It then calculates the greenhouse gas emissions resulting from land clearing in Brazil and assigns those estimated emissions to the lifecycle emissions analysis of corn-based ethanol in the U.S.

“It is unmistakable,” said Jennings, “decreasing petroleum use and greenhouse gas emissions will require both grain and cellulosic biofuels. Implementation of the new RFS needs to recognize this fact. If the EPA applies arbitrary indirect land use modeling and penalizes grain-based ethanol in the RFS rulemaking, ACE will be forced to oppose the rule change and encourage Congress to help provide a common sense remedy.”

Free Subscription to the Daily Biofuels Digest e-newsletter

Related Stories

Bad, bad biofuels: negative reaction to Science emission articles pours in from world press; emission tables, data ready now online for download

Reaction to two articles published in Science magazine continues to pour in from the world's media, almost universally dismissing the potential for biofuels to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. But ...

Newsday calls biofuels supporters “Biofools” in Science magazine article aftermath

Reaction to last week's shocking Science magazine articles continued, with a negative editorial in Newsday that called biofuels supporters "Biofools". The editorial stated that "ethanol and other biof...

Science magazine aftermath: respondents say new models forgot yield growth and distillers grains

In Washington, biofuels associations and academics continued to respond to Science magazine articles published last week that condemned US biofuel production efforts. The Argonne National Laborator...

New York Times says Energy Act safeguards “now look very smart” in light of global Science magazine article controversy

The New York Times ran an editorial reviewing the 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act in light of recent articles in Science magazine regarding greenhouse gas emissions and biofuels. The Time...

Analyst says Science magazine article erred on corn ethanol emissions; ethanol may raise needed barrier to land-use conversion for homes

An analysis of two articles appearing in Science magazine, which have led to resounding reversals in global biofuels policy, reports that actual land use conversion in the US, primarily from soy to co...

13 US newspapers run syndicated column linking biofuels to “chronic hunger, malnutrition and starvation” in poverty-stricken nations

Anti-biofuels sentiment continues to gain traction in the wake of two articles published in Science magazine questioning the emissions benefits of ethanol. An editorial by David Ridenour of the Nation...