Quantcast





RSS
February 14, 2008 | Jim Lane | Comments 0

Science magazine reaction: US scientists write to President Bush, Speaker Pelosi; Berkeley professor says recent policy decisions moving in the right direction

A group of scientists have sent a letter to US President George Bush and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi urging them to revise US biofuels policies in light of studies published this month in Science magazine.

Meanwhile, American Progress published a thoughtful interview with Alex Farrell, associate professor in the Energy and Resources Group at the University of California, Berkeley.

Farrell said: “If we want clean biofuels, then we need to demand or incentivize clean biofuels. And recent policy decisions are moving in that direction.

“One is in California. We have the low carbon fuel standard here in California. Also, in the Lieberman-Warner bill, there is an emission cap that would include transportation.

“The second one that I would mention is the recent energy bill, which includes some provisions for advanced biofuels that require a standard of performance for low greenhouse gases, with different types of performance standards for different types of fuels. Those parts of the provision are very important.

“The way out is to create markets for these greener biofuels, as well as providing research and development support.”

Free Subscription to the Daily Biofuels Digest e-newsletter


bdnl091008Subscribe FREE to the world's most-widely read biofuels daily. Enter your email in the box below,
or click here to subscribe:

Related Stories


  • Bad, bad biofuels: negative reaction to Science emission articles pours in from world press; emission tables, data ready now online for download
  • Reaction to two articles published in Science magazine continues to pour in from the world's media, almost universally dismissing the potential for biofuels to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. But ...
  • Newsday calls biofuels supporters “Biofools” in Science magazine article aftermath
  • Reaction to last week's shocking Science magazine articles continued, with a negative editorial in Newsday that called biofuels supporters "Biofools". The editorial stated that "ethanol and other biof...
  • Science magazine aftermath: respondents say new models forgot yield growth and distillers grains
  • In Washington, biofuels associations and academics continued to respond to Science magazine articles published last week that condemned US biofuel production efforts. The Argonne National Laborator...
  • New York Times says Energy Act safeguards “now look very smart” in light of global Science magazine article controversy
  • The New York Times ran an editorial reviewing the 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act in light of recent articles in Science magazine regarding greenhouse gas emissions and biofuels. The Time...
  • 13 US newspapers run syndicated column linking biofuels to “chronic hunger, malnutrition and starvation” in poverty-stricken nations
  • Anti-biofuels sentiment continues to gain traction in the wake of two articles published in Science magazine questioning the emissions benefits of ethanol. An editorial by David Ridenour of the Nation...
  • Analyst says Science magazine article erred on corn ethanol emissions; ethanol may raise needed barrier to land-use conversion for homes
  • An analysis of two articles appearing in Science magazine, which have led to resounding reversals in global biofuels policy, reports that actual land use conversion in the US, primarily from soy to co...

    Hot Topics


    The Hottest 50 Companies in Bioenergy
    Latest algae-to-energy news
    Latest jatropha news
    Latest Waste-to-energy news

    Entry Information

    Filed Under: PolicyResearch

    RSSPost a Comment  |  Trackback URL

    You must be logged in to post a comment.