<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today in Biofuels Opinion: &#8220;Tinkering with energy regulation can have disastrous consequences&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.biofuelsdigest.com/blog2/index.php/2008/07/03/today-in-biofuels-opinion-tinkering-with-energy-regulation-can-have-disastrous-consequences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.biofuelsdigest.com/blog2/2008/07/03/today-in-biofuels-opinion-tinkering-with-energy-regulation-can-have-disastrous-consequences/</link>
	<description>The world&#039;s most widely-read biofuels daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:30:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scottla</title>
		<link>http://www.biofuelsdigest.com/blog2/2008/07/03/today-in-biofuels-opinion-tinkering-with-energy-regulation-can-have-disastrous-consequences/comment-page-1/#comment-1611</link>
		<dc:creator>Scottla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biofuelsdigest.com/blog2/?p=3465#comment-1611</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll not reprise the pro/con of the food for fuel debate here.  What I am curious about is Peter Brabeck-Letmathe&#039;s comments about water use and fuel production.  !0,000 litres is roughly 2,600 gallons, so his comment suggests that it takes 2,600 gallons of water to produce 2 gallons of ethanol.

From where do these numbers come?  General production figures I&#039;m familiar with are at ratios of roughly 3:1!  It&#039;s outlandish claims and bizarre calculations like this that make this debate, at least currently, so ineffective.

(As an aside, it&#039;s worth noting that it takes roughly 2 gallons of water to complete the production of one gallon of gasoline.  These are the numbers that will result from efficient cellulosic ethanol production, if not better.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll not reprise the pro/con of the food for fuel debate here.  What I am curious about is Peter Brabeck-Letmathe&#8217;s comments about water use and fuel production.  !0,000 litres is roughly 2,600 gallons, so his comment suggests that it takes 2,600 gallons of water to produce 2 gallons of ethanol.</p>
<p>From where do these numbers come?  General production figures I&#8217;m familiar with are at ratios of roughly 3:1!  It&#8217;s outlandish claims and bizarre calculations like this that make this debate, at least currently, so ineffective.</p>
<p>(As an aside, it&#8217;s worth noting that it takes roughly 2 gallons of water to complete the production of one gallon of gasoline.  These are the numbers that will result from efficient cellulosic ethanol production, if not better.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
