Quantcast





RSS
October 24, 2008 | Jim Lane | Comments 1

20 advanced biofuel companies write to California ARB over proposed indirect land-use change regulation

In California, more than 20 advanced biofuel companies, plus key California-based researchers and investors, wrote to the California Air Resources Board regarding the Draft Regulation for the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard, which they said indirectly would discriminate against biofuels. The letter said  that the biofuels supports research on the effect of indirect land use changes, but said that no robust model has been yet developed to measure indirect land use changes.

Spearheaded by Brooke Coleman of the New Fuels Alliance, the letter says “The biofuels industry is firm in its commitment to produce sustainable fuels. But we are equally adamant that renewable fuels be subjected to the same regulatory standard as other fuels participating in the LCFS. As it stands today, biofuels are held to a higher standard than all other fuels, including oil.”

Free Subscription to the Daily Biofuels Digest e-newsletter


bdnl091008Subscribe FREE to the world's most-widely read biofuels daily. Enter your email in the box below,
or click here to subscribe:

Related Stories


  • Vilsack, Chu, Jackson to announce EPA ruling tomorrow on indirect land use change, RFS
  • In Washington, Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, Secretary of Energy Steven Chu and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson will hold a conference call to brief reporters on Pre...
  • California’s proposed Low Carbon Fuel Standard fields a pitched battle over emissions from indirect land-use changes
  • In California, Capitol Weekly has published an excellent short analysis of the Golden State's proposed Low Carbon Fuel Standard including a review of the storm over indirect land-use change impacts th...
  • Today in Biofuels Opinion: “By law, E.P.A. must consider indirect land use change emissions.”
  • Kate McMahon in the New York Times: "By law, E.P.A. must consider indirect land use change emissions. It is absurd that the biofuel industry, a year after this law was enacted, would turn around and t...
  • Growth Energy challenges indirect land use change with flurry of data, papers
  • In Washington, Growth Energy is distributing copies of new reports that it says challenge the "flawed, unproven and unscientific concept" of international indirect land use change.’ Growth Energy...
  • Sen. Harkin offers amendment to eliminate international indirect land use change as Renewable Fuel Standard criteria
  • In Washington, Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa offered an amendment to the funding bill for the Interior Department and EPA that would eliminate indirect land use change from consideration in greenhouse ga...
  • American Soybean Association tells congressional subcommittee that EPA ILUC rules are “unprecedented, untested”
  • in Washington, representatives from the American Soybean Association told the U.S. House of Representatives Small Business Subcommittee on Regulations, Healthcare and Trade that "the proposed EPA rule...

    Hot Topics


    The Hottest 50 Companies in Bioenergy
    Latest algae-to-energy news
    Latest jatropha news
    Latest Waste-to-energy news

    Entry Information

    Filed Under: Policy

    RSSComments: 1  |  Post a Comment  |  Trackback URL

    1. I know it’s a radical suggestion, but let’s ask for help. We simply can’t afford infighting and American chauvinism any longer. While we argue, other nations with clear land use policies, biofuel incentives and competitive research infrastructures are already shaping the global industry.

      We’ve just seen the US quietly relegated to supporting player status in the new G-20. Let’s not argue and navel gaze our way onto the sidelines of the global biofuels industry too.

    RSSPost a Comment  |  Trackback URL

    You must be logged in to post a comment.