Quantcast





RSS
May 26, 2009 | Jim Lane | Comments 0

Today in Biofuels Opinion: “It should be obvious to everyone but a few misguided advocates that ILUC (indirect land use change) is not ready for prime time.”

Marc Gunther, In search of the perfect biofuel : “Not all feedstocks are created equal. I knew that, of course, but the variations in productivity are dramatic. In terms of gallons of fuel that can be produced per acre, according to Aristides Patrinos, the president of a company called Synthetic Genomics, sugar cane and switch grass outperform corn and Jatropha. Still, his company, which was started by Craig Venter, is excited about Jatropha because it yields a high quality oil, grows in poor soils and can live in semi-arid regions.

Reuters: “The U.S. biofuels industry would be hamstrung if government regulators choose to use unfair and untested formulas that hold it responsible for greenhouse gases from crops overseas, ethanol groups said on Thursday. U.S. and California environmental regulators included indirect land use change overseas in formulas that measure greenhouse gases from biofuels in comparison to emissions from petroleum.

“It should be obvious to everyone but a few misguided advocates that ILUC (indirect land use change) is not ready for prime time,” Tom Buis of Growth Energy, a pro-ethanol trade group, told a House Agriculture Committee hearing.

Free Subscription to the Daily Biofuels Digest e-newsletter


bdnl091008Subscribe FREE to the world's most-widely read biofuels daily. Enter your email in the box below,
or click here to subscribe:

Related Stories


  • Today in BIofuels Opinion: But also there has been so much more attention paid to assessing penalties instead of how to solve [indirect land use change].
  • Lee Lynd, co-founder of Mascoma: With indirect land use change, the most important thing to realize is that ILUC is avoidable. But also there has been so much more attention paid to assessing penaltie...
  • Today in Biofuels Opinion: “Pop goes the ILUC Weasel. Guess where the weasels popped up this time?”
  • Thomas J. Pyle in the Washington Times: “The federal government would seize control of our energy use, rationing it to ensure it is both more expensive and less plentiful...this efficiency would req...
  • Today in Biofuels Opinion: “By law, E.P.A. must consider indirect land use change emissions.”
  • Kate McMahon in the New York Times: "By law, E.P.A. must consider indirect land use change emissions. It is absurd that the biofuel industry, a year after this law was enacted, would turn around and t...
  • EPA publishes results of peer review of indirect land use change
  • In Washington, the peer review of the renewable fuel standards lifecycle analysis - prominently, the analysis of international indirect land use change - is now available online from the EPA. The Rene...
  • Further analysis of “A Common Sense Theory of Indirect Land Use Change”
  • The article "A common sense approach to indirect land use change" that ran last week in Biofuels Digest has prompted an unusually elevated amount of response. The most detailed have included an essay ...
  • Growth Energy challenges indirect land use change with flurry of data, papers
  • In Washington, Growth Energy is distributing copies of new reports that it says challenge the "flawed, unproven and unscientific concept" of international indirect land use change.’ Growth Energy...

    Hot Topics


    The Hottest 50 Companies in Bioenergy
    Latest algae-to-energy news
    Latest jatropha news
    Latest Waste-to-energy news

    Entry Information

    Filed Under: Opinion

    Tags:

    RSSPost a Comment  |  Trackback URL

    You must be logged in to post a comment.