EPA’s top gun on indirect land…

EPA’s top gun on indirect land use change confesses she has never set foot on a US farm – http://tinyurl.com/ncovag

Free Subscription to the Daily Biofuels Digest e-newsletter

Related Stories

EPA says “No” to MSW, forest waste as qualifying biofuels: report

In Illinois, a team from McGuireWoods has published one of the most cogent summaries of the EPA's proposed greenhouse gas lifecycle rules released on May 5th. "The political and economic stakes are...

Today in Biofuels Opinion: “By law, E.P.A. must consider indirect land use change emissions.”

Kate McMahon in the New York Times: "By law, E.P.A. must consider indirect land use change emissions. It is absurd that the biofuel industry, a year after this law was enacted, would turn around and t...

Today in Biofuels Opinion: “[EPA's] current methodology treats biofuels and petroleum derived fuel inconsistently.”

From a letter to Senators Barbara Boxer and John Kerry from 20 bioenergy executives: "While we commend EPA for its preliminary efforts to consider all possible carbon impacts from trans...

Growth Energy challenges indirect land use change with flurry of data, papers

In Washington, Growth Energy is distributing copies of new reports that it says challenge the "flawed, unproven and unscientific concept" of international indirect land use change.’ Growth Energy...

Study finds that increase to 15 Bgy corn ethanol production will cause no indirect land-use changes or emissions

Air Improvement Resource released a study concluding that increasing the production of ethanol from con to 15 billion gallons per year would not result in the conversion of non-agricultureal lands in ...

California’s proposed Low Carbon Fuel Standard fields a pitched battle over emissions from indirect land-use changes

In California, Capitol Weekly has published an excellent short analysis of the Golden State's proposed Low Carbon Fuel Standard including a review of the storm over indirect land-use change impacts th...