Quantcast





RSS
September 10, 2009 | Jim Lane | Comments 0

Today in Biofuels Opinion: “[EPA's] current methodology treats biofuels and petroleum derived fuel inconsistently.”

From a letter to Senators Barbara Boxer and John Kerry from 20 bioenergy executives: “While we commend EPA for its preliminary efforts to consider all possible carbon impacts from transportation fuels, their current methodology treats biofuels and petroleum derived fuel inconsistently. The point of controversy is EPA’s preliminary decision to enforce “indirect land use change” penalties against biofuels. This is problematic for three reasons: (1) biofuels are being penalized for indirect carbon effects while petroleum is not, setting up an inconsistent system boundary and an asymmetrical comparison between the fuels; (2) indirect effects are incredibly difficult to predict with any precision, especially using economic models not designed for direct regulation;  and (3) there are public policy questions related to the fact that indirect land use change is not the land cultivated to produce biofuel feedstock, but rather is the land expansion theoretically occurring on the margins of the agricultural sector for food, feed and fiber production….It is also clear that “land use change” is not the only significant indirect carbon effect of using more biofuels. For example, using more biofuel replaces demand for the next gallon of petroleum introduced into the system (i.e. the marginal oil gallon), which will be produced using far more carbon?intensive practices (e.g. tar sands, thermally enhanced oil recovery, heavy crude, etc.). Crediting biofuels for this real world indirect benefit also corrects the asymmetry of comparing marginal biofuel gallons to average 2005 gasoline or diesel, which is a mythical baseline that will get much dirtier over time. Even Saudi Arabia, home to the largest light crude reserves in the world, is beginning to move away from light sweet to sour fossil crude oil.”
The complete letter is available here.

Cleantech named the following bioenergy companies to its annual Global Cleantech 100: Amyris Biotechnologies, BioGasol, Chemrec. Cobalt Biofuels, Coskata, Gevo, LS9, Sapphire Energy, Solazyme, and ZeaChem

Free Subscription to the Daily Biofuels Digest e-newsletter


bdnl091008Subscribe FREE to the world's most-widely read biofuels daily. Enter your email in the box below,
or click here to subscribe:

Related Stories


  • Today in Biofuels Opinion: “the inclusion of indirect land use change measurements and methodology – may discourage investment in continued research and development.”
  • Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) Executive Vice President Brent Erickson: “The biotechnology industry supports and applauds California’s attempt to mitigate the impact of transportation o...
  • Solazyme receives algae-based jet fuel order from US Navy
  • In California, Solazyme announced that it has won a contract to supply an additional  1,500 gallons of 100% algae derived jet fuel for testing and certification by the U.S. Navy.  Solazyme previousl...
  • Renewable Fuels Association president says jihad against biofuels has “a great deal to do with the loss of petroleum market share that will occur”
  • Bob Dinneen, president of the Renewable Fuels Association issued a statement at the Cellulosic Ethanol Summit held in Washington, D.C "Either we will continue on a path toward greater energy divers...
  • Today in Biofuels Opinion: “What’s being called Son of Black Liquor dwarfs the original black-liquor loophole.”
  • From Dead Tree Edition: "For the second time in a year, the U.S. pulp and paper industry has hijacked a multi-billion dollar federal program that was supposed to promote new biofuels. What's being cal...
  • Today in Biofuels Opinion: “Renewable Fuels Are the Cure for Our Addiction to Oil. Unfortunately not.”
  • From Cattle Network: "In 8 short years, ethanol grew from 1% of the fuel supply to 7% with the help of numerous policy decisions by Congress and state governments...Federal policy and research support...
  • Today in Biofuels Opinion: “[Algae is] very appealing if you don’t think hard about it.”
  • Jon Holzfaster, chairman of the Nebraska Corn Board: “Although we support initiatives that look at reducing greenhouse gases, we cannot support initiatives that include very questionable science and...

    Hot Topics


    The Hottest 50 Companies in Bioenergy
    Latest algae-to-energy news
    Latest jatropha news
    Latest Waste-to-energy news

    Entry Information

    Filed Under: Opinion

    Tags:

    RSSPost a Comment  |  Trackback URL

    You must be logged in to post a comment.