In Michigan, the German Marshall Fund recently hosted a debate on biofuels and indirect land use change between Tim Searchinger, transatlantic fellow at the German Marshall Fund and Bruce Dale, professor at Michigan State University. The debate was moderated by Juliet Eilperin of the Washington Post and is available on video here.
According to one industry observer, “Dale pretty much wiped the floor with Searchinger.”
Free Subscription to the Daily Biofuels Digest e-newsletter
Related Stories
Today in Biofuels Opinion: “By law, E.P.A. must consider indirect land use change emissions.”Kate McMahon in the New York Times: "By law, E.P.A. must consider indirect land use change emissions. It is absurd that the biofuel industry, a year after this law was enacted, would turn around and t...
Indirect Land Use Change controversy swirls: two Searchinger critiques published; California LCFS comments from New Fuels Alliance, Friends of the Earth, Shell Oil among many othersThe Indirect Land Use Change controversy continued to roil as two papers were released critical of the calculations reached by a team led by Tim Searchinger in the seminal Princeton study that ignited...
Today in Biofuels Opinion: “It would be easy – and wrong – to rely on a much-publicized study that connects U.S. corn ethanol production to greenhouse gas release via indirect land use change.”A blog post on IndyStar.com: "I for one applaud the IRL for switching to sugar based ethanol, and hope they will switch to cellulosic when the technology becomes available. Ethanol can be a great fuel...
Wrangling at EPA, OMB over indirect land-use biofuels impact numbersIn Washington, intense lobbying is underway in the last days of the Bush administration over indirect land use change modeling.
The Energy Independence and Security Act directed the EPA to conduct ...
Today in BIofuels Opinion: But also there has been so much more attention paid to assessing penalties instead of how to solve [indirect land use change].Lee Lynd, co-founder of Mascoma: With indirect land use change, the most important thing to realize is that ILUC is avoidable. But also there has been so much more attention paid to assessing penaltie...
Today in Biofuels Opinion: “The intensifying debate over potential indirect land use changes resulting from biofuels expansion…is tainted by ideological or political agendas.”From Climate Change Central: "While biofuels have been blamed for all food price increases, not all major food stocks are used in biofuel production. For example, rice – which soared in price from...