Ethanol good news, bad news: E85 beats E10 in fuel economy in Nebraska study; producers face double counting of GHGs under new EPA rules
In Washington, the EPA said that “nearly all” US ethanol plants will qualify as “major emitters” of greenhouse gases and be required to obtain Title V permits, under new proposed EPA regulations.
The new rule, proposed by EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson after a landmark 2007 Supreme Court ruling permitting EPA to classify and regulate CO2 as a pollutant, requires emitters of more than 25,000 tons of CO2 to obtain new EPA permits at time of construction or modification.
The EPA said that 86 facilities would qualify as major emitters, and only 38 plants with capacities under 40 Mgy would be exempted, but said that new data suggests that the overall final number of plants could be higher.
The agency said that it would have a final number after emitters commenced reporting data to the EPA on January 1, 2010.
The bad news for ethanol innovation in the US contrasted with good news on energy efficiency, where a University of Nebraska study concluded that E85 that higher ethanol blends increase engine efficiency by improved energy conversion by up to 14 percent, compared to E10.
Researchers said that the variables in comparing E85, E10 and straight gasoline were not only the BTUs in the fuel, but the energy efficiency and cost of the fuel. The researchers found that “Specific vehicles may test out differently based on engine design and settings, but increased efficiency from ethanol blends make sense, and for the fuel prices we looked at in the study, e85 was the best choice every time.”
More on GHGs
UNICA says EPA is undercounting GHG emission reduction in Brazilian ethanol
EPA to launch new, comprehensive greenhouse gas reporting system
More on E85
State official says E85 “not cost effective” for Georgia
Biofuels Digest readers report E85 case studies
Propel Fuels, Enterprise Rent-a-Car sign partnership to drive E85 use in California
Free Subscription to the Daily Biofuels Digest e-newsletter
Subscribe FREE to the world's most-widely read biofuels daily. Enter your email in the box below,
Related Stories
Hot Topics
The Hottest 50 Companies in Bioenergy
Latest algae-to-energy news
Latest jatropha news
Latest Waste-to-energy news
Entry Information
Filed Under: Featured • Producer News • Top Story
Comments: 1 | Post a Comment | Trackback URL
Post a Comment | Trackback URL
You must be logged in to post a comment.



Joelle Brink | Oct 12, 2009 | Reply
It seems strange to cite a single CO2 number for ethanol when it is made by a variety of processes.
It would be interesting to see GHGs by process type, especially whether enzymatic fermentation releases more CO2 than other processes. One stage of this process is actually known as the “beer”, which implies plenty of CO2 bubbles.
Do Fischer-Tropsch and other complex heating and pressurizing processes produce more or less GHGs?
Also, is energy consumed for ethanol production also factored into the CO2 calculation?