Quantcast





RSS
November 09, 2009 | Jim Lane | Comments 1

Closing down $24 billion biofuels tax credit loophole: a good idea (here’s why)

blackliquorIn Washington, the Health Care Bill passed the US House of Representatives and included — as part of a 42-page “manager’s amendment”, a provision striking a biofuel tax credit used by pulp and paper firms that could have been worth up to $24 billion. According to a report in FOX News, “That’s desperately needed revenue to help offset the cost of the health plan.”

The complete manager’s amendment – which is NOT seen in the bill as available on Thomas.gov — is available for download here. The biofuels provisions begin with Section 555, “the Second Generation Biofuels Producer Credit” on page 14 of the text.

There has been some confusion about the provision in the industry — understandable, because “elimination of a biofuel tax credit” sounds like bad news. However, the House text is actually favorable.

First, the bill as passed amends the term “qualified feedstock” for the $1.01 per gallon cellulosic ethanol producer credit to mean “i. any lignocellulosic or hemicellulosic matter that is available on a renewable or recurring basis, and ii. any cultivate algae, cyanobacteria or lemna.”

This goes a long ways towards making the biofuels tax credits feedstock neutral, and specifically is favorable to producers of microcrops such as lemna (e.g. Petroalgae) and cyanobacteria (e.g. Biolight Harvesting, Inventure Chemicals), which had previously not received recognition.

Second, the tax credit that was shut down was a credit recognizing black liquor — a byproduct of pulp and paper manufacturing — as a biofuel, rather than a biofuel feedstock. The current structure of the credit permitted pulp and paper mills to claim a 50 cent gallon payout per gallon of black liquor that was burned in boilers to make steam for power generation — a practice for many years in the industry, rather than a new practice. The manufacturers were able to claim between $6 billion and $7 billion in payouts in the most recent fiscal year, according to Digest sources.

Under the new provision — named nicknamed “Son of Black Liquor,”  pulp and paper manufacturers could have claimed the $1.01 cellulosic biofuels producer credit, and claims could have ballooned to $24 billion according to Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), the bill’s sponsor. The way was cleared by a June IRS ruling which was published last month. This, despite the fact that black liquor is not used as a transportation fuel.

However, companies that utilize black liquor as a feedstock for an advanced biofuels process — thereby using black liquor as a feedstock rather than a fuel, will still qualify for the credit, under the US House provision. Black liquor gasification is a technology hotly pursued by the Swedish government and a collection of Swedish forestry companies (including Kappa Kraftliner, SCA, Sveaskog), the Swedish Energy Agency, the research foundation Mistra, and several institutions including Luleå University of Technology , Umeå University, Chalmers University of Technology, STFI, and Swedish Corrosion Institute.

Black liquor gasification is now at pilot scale and heading rapidly towards commercialization in the next few years.

More on the issue, here, in a good recap for riisinfo.

A copy of the IRS memo from June is here.

A copy of a release from the Senate Committee of Finance discussing their intent to close the black liquor loophole is here.

Free Subscription to the Daily Biofuels Digest e-newsletter


bdnl091008Subscribe FREE to the world's most-widely read biofuels daily. Enter your email in the box below,
or click here to subscribe:

Related Stories


  • European industrial ethanol producers band to close ethanol import loophole
  • An article in Biofuel Review discusses efforts in the EU to close an ethanol import loophole. Importers are claiming that ethanol blends are subject to Chapter 38 of EU regulations, which exempt it f...
  • US tax loophole gives $1 per gallon biofuel blending credit to producers adding 0.1% petroleum to imported biodiesel
  • In Europe, biodiesel producers are complaining about a US tax loophole that allows traders to capture a US tax credit of $1 per gallon by importing Malaysian biodiesel, adding 0.1% petroleum diesel to...
  • Iowa Senator leads effort to close loophole circumventing Brazilian ethanol tariff
  • In Washington, Sen. Chuck Grassley is leading an effort to close a loophole allowing oil companies to circumvent the tariff on Brazilian ethanol. The loophole allows oil companies to receive a rebate ...
  • Today in Biofuels Opinion: “What’s being called Son of Black Liquor dwarfs the original black-liquor loophole.”
  • From Dead Tree Edition: "For the second time in a year, the U.S. pulp and paper industry has hijacked a multi-billion dollar federal program that was supposed to promote new biofuels. What's being cal...
  • European groups call for ban on imported B99 from US
  • Europe's Renewable Energy Association is asking the UK's Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform and the European Union to ban cheap imported B99 biodiesel coming from the US. The gro...
  • Florida Governor Crist calls for reduction of Brazilian ethanol tariff
  • In Brazil, Florida governor Charlie Crist said that he opposed the Brazilian ethanol tariff and would lobby the state's Congressional delegation to reduce it.  The 54 cent per gallon tariff is sche...

    Hot Topics


    The Hottest 50 Companies in Bioenergy
    Latest algae-to-energy news
    Latest jatropha news
    Latest Waste-to-energy news

    Entry Information

    Filed Under: FeaturedNews & Financial AnalysisProducer NewsTop Story

    Tags:

    RSSComments: 1  |  Post a Comment  |  Trackback URL

    1. My questions:

      1. so they are saying it has to be liquid at room temperature. What is room temperature exactly? Things like glycerin are going to have different characteristics depending on catalyst, and their gel point is in that range. This could be a big problem for people wanting to ship warm glycerin around and use it to spray on coal, for example.

      2. It appears that they want us to re-register for the program so that we can provide the type, feedstock, and BTU content.

      3. This amendment seems to be addressing the $1 non-refundable credit, not the 50 cent credit. Is that the case and if so, what is addressing the 50 cent version?

      4. I don’t see where it extends the credit. Without an extension, it expires at the end of 2009 anyway. Maybe I just missed it.

    RSSPost a Comment  |  Trackback URL

    You must be logged in to post a comment.